What counts as a correction
A correction addresses a factual statement, calculation, quotation, attribution or material omission that was wrong when published. A product rate changing after publication is normally a freshness update, not proof that the earlier statement was erroneous. This distinction matters because quietly replacing an error with a new value can conceal the publication record.
Examples of correctable issues include citing the wrong effective date, misidentifying an issuer, applying a formula incorrectly, describing an eligibility rule too broadly or linking a source that does not support the claim. Differences of opinion are not automatically errors, but an interpretation must still be fairly based on the cited evidence and identify important uncertainty.
How to report an issue
A useful report includes the exact URL, the disputed text, why it appears wrong, the primary source supporting the correction and a safe way to contact the reporter if clarification is required. Reports can be sent through the official channels listed on the contact page. Passwords, one-time codes, account credentials and private portfolio records should never be included.
Anonymous reports can be reviewed when they contain enough evidence. Identity does not determine whether a correction is valid. Issuers and commercial partners receive the same evidentiary treatment as other reporters and cannot purchase a change in coverage.
Review process
The editorial team first preserves the relevant publication state and checks the cited evidence. For financial claims, the original reviewer or another appropriately qualified reviewer assesses whether the issue changes the conclusion, a calculation or the risk presentation. If the evidence is incomplete, the team may add a limitation or temporarily withdraw the affected page while review continues.
High-severity errors include statements that could materially mislead a reader about capital protection, eligibility, liquidity, tax, religious compliance, legal rights or expected return. These receive priority. Typographical errors that do not change meaning can be fixed without a formal correction note, although the underlying version history should remain available internally.
Publishing the correction
A material correction changes the affected text, updates the page date and adds a clear note describing what changed and why. The note should not expose private reporter information. If the correction invalidates a substantial part of the article, the page can be withdrawn until a complete re-review is finished.
Public dates reflect the actual substantive update. A correction does not justify changing unrelated pages, and machine-readable dates must match the dates shown to readers.
Appeals and unresolved evidence
A reporter may submit additional primary evidence if they disagree with the outcome. Sahulat Capital can leave a statement unchanged when the available evidence supports it, but the decision should document the sources considered. Where authoritative sources conflict or remain ambiguous, the page should explain the conflict rather than claim false certainty.
Relationship to data freshness
Rates, market conditions, regulations and provider terms evolve. Scheduled source checks are governed by the data-freshness policy. Corrections repair past errors; freshness updates reflect later changes. Both processes require honest dates and must never create a false impression of recent review.